千万建筑资料下载 →
Geophysical Prospecting, 2012, 60, 782–801
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.2012.01084.x
Iterative method for the separation of blended seismic data: discussion on the algorithmic aspects
Araz Mahdad , Panagiotis Doulgeris and Gerrit Blacquiere` Delft University of Technology, Geotechnology Department, Section of applied geophysics and petrophysics, Stevinweg 1, PO-Box 5048, 2628 CN Delft, The Netherlands. Received Jun 2011, revision accepted March 2012 A B S T R A C T
Recently much attention has been given to the possibility of shooting in an overlapping
fashion, the so-called blended or simultaneous acquisition. In conventional acquisition the
time intervals between successive sources are large enough to avoid interference in time.
In blending, a temporal overlap between source responses is allowed. This additional
degree of freedom in survey design has the potential to significantly reduce seismic
acquisition costs while maintaining or improving the data quality. Deblending is the
procedure of retrieving data as if they were acquired in the conventional, unblended way.
This is an essential step in the case where standard processing flows are applied. Several
methods have been proposed to perform data separation with the majority of them falling
into two categories. The first category consists in methods that filter out the blending
noise by arranging seismic data in some domain, whereas inversion techniques fall into
the second category. We recently introduced an iterative estimation and subtraction
algorithm that integrates elements of both categories. This method exploits the fact that
the character of the blending noise differs in different domains, e.g., it is coherent in the
common source domain but incoherent in the common receiver, common-offset or
common midpoint domains. Up to now, our method relies on the interaction with a
human operator. The automation of the thresholding process is addressed in this paper,
leading to a hands-off algorithm for the separation of blended data, optimized for both
efficiency and effectiveness. We found that one of the major limiting factors is the edge
artefacts generated by the coherence-pass filter. The effectiveness of the coherence-pass
filter has a considerable influence on the convergence of our deblending algorithm. This
is shown by testing different coherence-pass filters on marine data as well as introducing
errors in the coherence-pass process. We show that these data estimation errors can be
handled properly and the best result is obtained using a τ -p filter as a coherence-pass
filter. Furthermore, very promising results are obtained on numerically-blended land data.
I N T R O D U C T I O N Key words: Deblending, Thresholding, Coherence-pass filter.
Several authors have discussed the concept of simultaneous shooting for impulsive and vibroseis type sources as well as
E-mail: a.mahdad@tudelft.nl their particular advantages. Methods to utilize more than one source simultaneously in the field have been taken into con-sideration for a long time in land surveys. The use of simul-taneous vibrators transmitting the same or different reference signals was proposed by Silverman (1979). The High Fidelity Vibratory Seismic (HFVS) method was developed by Sallas,
782 C 2012 European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers
久久建筑网m.kkreddy.com提供大量:建筑图纸、施工方案、工程书籍、建筑论文、合同表格、标准规范、CAD图纸等内容。